Scale Transfer in 1849 : Heinrich Schwabe to Rudolf Wolf
arXiv:2210.03362 · doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02103-4
Abstract
The focus of this study is to reveal the reason behind a scale problem detected around 1849 in the historical version of the International Sunspot Number Series, i.e. version 1 (Leussu et al, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 559, A28, 2013; Friedli, Solar Phys.291, 2505, 2016). From 1826 to 1848 Heinrich Schwabe's observations were considered primary by Rudolf Wolf, and a shift of primary observer from Schwabe to Wolf in 1849 seems to have led to an inconsistency in the Sunspot Number series. In this study we benefited from various datasets, the most important being Schwabe's raw counts from the Mittheilungen (Prof. Wolf's Journals) that have been digitised at the Royal Observatory of Belgium between 2017 and 2019. We provide a robust quantification of the detected problem by using classic algebraic calculations but also different methods such as a method inspired by Lockwood et al (Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 119(7), 5172, 2014), hence assigning a modern k-factor to Schwabe's observations before 1849. We also assess the implications of this 1849 inconsistency on the International Sunspot Number series (Versions 1 and 2) before and after 1849.
References in corpus (7)
- Thaddäus Derfflinger's sunspot observations during 1802-1824: A primary reference to understand the Dalton Minimum
- Updated sunspot group number reconstruction for 1749-1996 using the active day fraction method
- Robustness of Solar-Cycle Empirical Rules Across Different Series Including an Updated ADF Sunspot Group Series
- Revisiting Christoph Scheiner's Sunspot Records: a New Perspective on Solar Activity of the Early Telescopic Era
- Stephan Prantner's Sunspot Observations during the Dalton Minimum
- Uncertainty quantification in sunspot counts
- Revisiting the Amplitude of Solar Cycle 9: The Case of Sunspot Observations by W.C. Bond