On the Salient Limitations of the Methods of Assembly Theory and their Classification of Molecular Biosignatures
arXiv:2210.00901 · doi:10.1038/s41540-024-00403-y
Abstract
We demonstrate that the assembly pathway method underlying assembly theory (AT) is an encoding scheme widely used by popular statistical compression algorithms. We show that in all cases (synthetic or natural) AT performs similarly to other simple coding schemes and underperforms compared to system-related indexes based upon algorithmic probability that take into account statistical repetitions but also the likelihood of other computable patterns. Our results imply that the assembly index does not offer substantial improvements over existing methods, including traditional statistical ones, and imply that the separation between living and non-living compounds following these methods has been reported before.
References in corpus (8)
- The Algorithmic Origins of Life
- A Review of Methods for Estimating Algorithmic Complexity: Options, Challenges, and New Directions
- Emergence and algorithmic information dynamics of systems and observers
- Assembly Theory and its Relationship with Computational Complexity
- False positives and the challenge of testing the alien hypothesis
- An Optimal, Universal and Agnostic Decoding Method for Message Reconstruction, Bio and Technosignature Detection
- Experimental Measurement of Assembly Indices are Required to Determine The Threshold for Life
- Assembly Theory is an approximation to algorithmic complexity based on LZ compression that does not explain selection or evolution