Algorithmic decision making methods for fair credit scoring

Abstract

The effectiveness of machine learning in evaluating the creditworthiness of loan applicants has been demonstrated for a long time. However, there is concern that the use of automated decision-making processes may result in unequal treatment of groups or individuals, potentially leading to discriminatory outcomes. This paper seeks to address this issue by evaluating the effectiveness of 12 leading bias mitigation methods across 5 different fairness metrics, as well as assessing their accuracy and potential profitability for financial institutions. Through our analysis, we have identified the challenges associated with achieving fairness while maintaining accuracy and profitabiliy, and have highlighted both the most successful and least successful mitigation methods. Ultimately, our research serves to bridge the gap between experimental machine learning and its practical applications in the finance industry.

References in corpus (6)

• Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
• Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
• A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscape
• Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implications
• Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithms
• Improving Fairness of AI Systems with Lossless De-biasing