Peer Recommendation Interventions for Health-related Social Support: a Feasibility Assessment

Abstract

Online health communities (OHCs) offer the promise of connecting with supportive peers. Forming these connections first requires finding relevant peers - a process that can be time-consuming. Peer recommendation systems are a computational approach to make finding peers easier during a health journey. By encouraging OHC users to alter their online social networks, peer recommendations could increase available support. But these benefits are hypothetical and based on mixed, observational evidence. To experimentally evaluate the effect of peer recommendations, we conceptualize these systems as health interventions designed to increase specific beneficial connection behaviors. In this paper, we designed a peer recommendation intervention to increase two behaviors: reading about peer experiences and interacting with peers. We conducted an initial feasibility assessment of this intervention by conducting a 12-week field study in which 79 users of CaringBridge received weekly peer recommendations via email. Our results support the usefulness and demand for peer recommendation and suggest benefits to evaluating larger peer recommendation interventions. Our contributions include practical guidance on the development and evaluation of peer recommendation interventions for OHCs.

CSCW 2025, 24 article pages, 34 pages of references & appendices, 17 figures

References in corpus (6)

• Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data
• Measuring the Business Value of Recommender Systems
• Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning
• Simplify and Robustify Negative Sampling for Implicit Collaborative Filtering
• A Re-visit of the Popularity Baseline in Recommender Systems
• Optimizer Benchmarking Needs to Account for Hyperparameter Tuning