Errors When Constraining Hot Blackbody Parameters with Optical Photometry

Abstract

Measuring blackbody parameters for objects hotter than a few 10^4K with optical data alone is common in many astrophysical studies. However this process is prone to large errors because at those temperatures the optical bands are mostly sampling the Rayleigh-Jeans tail of the spectrum. Here we quantify these errors by simulating different blackbodies, sampling them in various bands with realistic measurement errors, and re-fitting them to blackbodies using two different methods and two different priors. We find that when using only optical data, log-uniform priors perform better than uniform priors. Still, measured temperatures of blackbodies above ~35,000K can be wrong by ~10,000K, and only lower limits can be obtained for temperatures of blackbodies hotter than ~50,000K. Bolometric luminosities estimated from optical-only blackbody fits can be wrong by factors of 3-5. When adding space-based ultraviolet data, these errors shrink significantly. For when such data are not available, we provide plots and tables of the distributions of true temperatures that can result in various measured temperatures. It is important to take these distributions into account as systematic uncertainties when fitting hot blackbodies with optical data alone.

arXiv commentAccpeted for publication in AAS Journals

References in corpus (19)

• emcee: The MCMC Hammer
• Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger
• The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope
• Tidal Disruption Events
• Early supernovae light-curves following the shock-breakout
• The diversity of Type II supernova versus the similarity in their progenitors
• A unified model for tidal disruption events
• Photometric Response Functions of the SDSS Imager
• Weighing Black Holes using Tidal Disruption Events
• The early UV/Optical emission from core-collapse supernovae
• Optical-Ultraviolet Tidal Disruption Events
• Science with a wide-field UV transient explorer
• The First Hours of the GW170817 Kilonova and the Importance of Early Optical and Ultraviolet Observations for Constraining Emission Models
• Measuring stellar and black hole masses of tidal disruption events
• UV/Optical emission from the expanding envelopes of type II supernovae
• Constraints on the Progenitor of SN 2016gkg From Its Shock-Cooling Light Curve
• Interpreting Flux from Broadband Photometry
• Exploring the efficacy and limitations of shock-cooling models: new analysis of Type II supernovae observed by the Kepler mission
• The Evolution of Temperature and Bolometric Luminosity in Type-II Supernovae

Cited by in corpus (9)

• From Discovery to the First Month of the Type II Supernova 2023ixf: High and Variable Mass Loss in the Final Year before Explosion
• AT 2021loi: A Bowen Fluorescence Flare with a Rebrightening Episode, Occurring in a Previously-Known AGN
• Light-Curve Structure and Halpha Line Formation in the Tidal Disruption Event AT 2019azh
• The Type Ibn Supernova 2019kbj -- Indications for Diversity in Type Ibn Supernova Progenitors
• The Evryscope Fast Transient Engine: Real-Time Detection for Rapidly Evolving Transients
• Massive stars exploding in a He-rich circumstellar medium. XI. Diverse evolution of five Ibn SNe 2020nxt, 2020taz, 2021bbv, 2023utc and 2024aej
• SN 2019odp: A Massive Oxygen-Rich Type Ib Supernova
• Eruptive mass loss less than a year before the explosion of superluminous supernovae: I. The cases of SN 2020xga and SN 2022xgc
• SN 2022ngb: A faint, slowly evolving Type IIb supernova with a low-mass envelope