Locating disparities in machine learning

Abstract

Machine learning can provide predictions with disparate outcomes, in which subgroups of the population (e.g., defined by age, gender, or other sensitive attributes) are systematically disadvantaged. In order to comply with upcoming legislation, practitioners need to locate such disparate outcomes. However, previous literature typically detects disparities through statistical procedures for when the sensitive attribute is specified a priori. This limits applicability in real-world settings where datasets are high dimensional and, on top of that, sensitive attributes may be unknown. As a remedy, we propose a data-driven framework called Automatic Location of Disparities (ALD) which aims at locating disparities in machine learning. ALD meets several demands from industry: ALD (1) is applicable to arbitrary machine learning classifiers; (2) operates on different definitions of disparities (e.g., statistical parity or equalized odds); and (3) deals with both categorical and continuous predictors even if disparities arise from complex and multi-way interactions known as intersectionality (e. g., age above 60 and female). ALD produces interpretable audit reports as output. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ALD based on both synthetic and real-world datasets. As a result, we empower practitioners to effectively locate and mitigate disparities in machine learning algorithms, conduct algorithmic audits, and protect individuals from discrimination.

References in corpus (7)

• Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
• Counterfactual Fairness
• Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices
• Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness
• Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: An Excursion Through the Lens of Causality
• FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transport
• Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?