Three approaches to chiral form interactions
arXiv:2207.01767 · doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2023.102016
Abstract
We briefly review and critically compare three approaches to constructing Lagrangian theories of self-interacting Abelian chiral form fields with manifest Lorentz invariance. The first approach relies on the original ideas of Pasti, Sorokin, and Tonin (PST) and has been explored since the late 1990s. The second approach was introduced by Ashoke Sen in 2015. The third approach has been developed over the last few years in the works of the present authors and other collaborators and may be called the 'clone field' formalism since it features an auxiliary 'clone' of the gauge field sector. We argue that this last approach shares the attractive features of the other two while avoiding their respective shortcomings. Like in Sen's approach, within the clone field formalism, arbitrary interactions can be straightforwardly included in any number of dimensions (treating interactions becomes very difficult in the PST formalism in dimensions greater than 6). Like in the PST approach, all the auxiliary fields are gauged away on-shell (while in Sen's approach, they merely decouple from the physical fields but remain dynamical).
contribution to the special volume on Higher Spin Geometry
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Interacting Chiral Form Field Theories and -like Flows in Six and Higher Dimensions
- Unifying Approaches to Chiral Bosons
- Democracy from topology
- Flows in the Space of Interacting Chiral Boson Theories
- Double dimensional reduction of M5-brane action in Sen formalism
- On correlation functions of higher-spin currents in arbitrary dimensions
- Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Discrete Series Scalars in dS
- Dualities Among Massive, Partially Massless and Shift Symmetric Fields on (A)dS
- Massless chiral fields in six dimensions
- Coupling of Branes and Twisted Self-Duality in the Maxwell-Chern-Simons Theory
- Monopoles, Clarified
- Nonlinear chiral forms in the Sen formulation