Extracting Hale Cycle Related Components from Cosmic-Ray Data Using Principal Component Analysis
arXiv:2206.09350 · doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02048-8
Abstract
We decompose the monthly cosmic-ray data, using several neutron monitor count rates, of Cycles 19-24 with principal component analysis (PCA). We show using different cycle limits that the first and second PC of cosmic-ray (CR) data explain 77-79% and 13-15% of the total variation of the Oulu CR Cycles 20-24 (C20- C24), 73-77% and 13-17% of the variation of Hermanus C20-C24, and 74-78% and 17-21% of the Climax C19-C22, respectively. The PC1 time series of the CR Cycles 19-24 has only one peak in its power spectrum at the period 10.95 years, which is the average solar cycle period for the interval SC19-SC24. The PC2 time series of the same cycles has a clear peak at period 21.90 (Hale cycle) and another peak at 1/3 of that period with no peak at the solar cycle period. We show that the PC2 of the CR is essential in explaining the differences in the intensities of the even and odd cycles of the CR. The odd cycles have positive phase in the first half and negative phase in the second half of their PC2. This leads to slow decrease of the intensity in the beginning of the cycle and at minimum for the odd cycles. On the contrary, for the even cycles the phases are vice versa and this leads to faster decrease and more rapid recovery in the CR intensity of the cycle. As a consequence the even cycles have more peak-like structure. The only exceptions of this rule are Cycles 23 and 24 such the former has almost zero line PC2, and the latter has similar PC2 than the earlier odd cycles. These results are confirmed with skewness-kurtosis (S-K) analysis. Furthermore, S-K shows that other even and odd cycles, except Cycle 21, are on the regression line with correlation coefficient 0.85. The Cycles 21 of all calculated eight stations are compactly located in the S -K coordinate system and have smaller skewnesses and higher kurtoses than the odd Cycles 23.
21 pages, 10 figures, accepted to Solar Physics
References in corpus (6)
- Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays during the neutron monitor era: Calibration using PAMELA data for 2006--2010
- A new method to estimate annual solar wind parameters and contributions of different solar wind structures to geomagnetic activity
- Comparison of geomagnetic indices during even and odd solar cycles SC17-SC24: Signatures of Gnevyshev gap in geomagnetic activity
- Cross correlation and time-lag between cosmic ray intensity and solar activity during solar cycles 21, 22 and 23
- Comparison of the shape and temporal evolution of even and odd solar cycles
- Separating aa-index into Solar and Hale Cycle Related Components Using Principal Component Analysis