On two notions of total positivity for partial flag varieties
arXiv:2206.05806 · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2022.108855
Abstract
Given integers , let denote the type partial flag variety consisting of all chains of subspaces inside , where each has dimension . Lusztig (1994, 1998) introduced the totally positive part as the subset of partial flags which can be represented by a totally positive matrix, and defined the totally nonnegative part as the closure of . On the other hand, following Postnikov (2007), we define and as the subsets of where all Plücker coordinates are positive and nonnegative, respectively. It follows from the definitions that Lusztig's total positivity implies Plücker positivity, and it is natural to ask when these two notions of positivity agree. Rietsch (2009) proved that they agree in the case of the Grassmannian , and Chevalier (2011) showed that the two notions are distinct for . We show that in general, the two notions agree if and only if are consecutive integers. We give an elementary proof of this result (including for the case of Grassmannians) based on classical results in linear algebra and the theory of total positivity. We also show that the cell decomposition of coincides with its matroid decomposition if and only if are consecutive integers, which was previously only known for complete flag varieties, Grassmannians, and . Finally, we determine which notions of positivity are compatible with a natural action of the cyclic group of order that rotates the index set.
21 pages. v2: Minor changes
References in corpus (6)
- Total positivity, Grassmannians, and networks
- Totally nonnegative Grassmannian and Grassmann polytopes
- The -stable pieces of the wonderful compactification
- Gradient flows, adjoint orbits, and the topology of totally nonnegative flag varieties
- On the totally positive grassmannian
- Totally Nonnegative Tropical Flags and the Totally Nonnegative Flag Dressian