Relevance in Dialogue: Is Less More? An Empirical Comparison of Existing Metrics, and a Novel Simple Metric

Abstract

In this work, we evaluate various existing dialogue relevance metrics, find strong dependency on the dataset, often with poor correlation with human scores of relevance, and propose modifications to reduce data requirements and domain sensitivity while improving correlation. Our proposed metric achieves state-of-the-art performance on the HUMOD dataset while reducing measured sensitivity to dataset by 37%-66%. We achieve this without fine-tuning a pretrained language model, and using only 3,750 unannotated human dialogues and a single negative example. Despite these limitations, we demonstrate competitive performance on four datasets from different domains. Our code, including our metric and experiments, is open sourced.

18 pages, 7 figures

References in corpus (4)

• DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset
• Chameleons in imagined conversations: A new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs
• An Argumentative Dialogue System for COVID-19 Vaccine Information
• On the Use of Linguistic Features for the Evaluation of Generative Dialogue Systems