Measurement incompatibility vs. Bell non-locality: an approach via tensor norms
arXiv:2205.12668 · doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040325
Abstract
Measurement incompatibility and quantum non-locality are two key features of quantum theory. Violations of Bell inequalities require quantum entanglement and incompatibility of the measurements used by the two parties involved in the protocol. We analyze the converse question: for which Bell inequalities is the incompatibility of measurements enough to ensure a quantum violation? We relate the two questions by comparing two tensor norms on the space of dichotomic quantum measurements: one characterizing measurement compatibility and the second one characterizing violations of a given Bell inequality. We provide sufficient conditions for the equivalence of the two notions in terms of the matrix describing the correlation Bell inequality. We show that the CHSH inequality and its variants are the only ones satisfying it.
arXiv commentnew applications and results about the optimality of the CHSH game
References in corpus (13)
- Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
- Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality
- An Invitation to Quantum Incompatibility
- Measurements incompatible in Quantum Theory cannot be measured jointly in any other local theory
- Incompatibility robustness of quantum measurements: a unified framework
- Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality
- Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general
- Survey on Nonlocal Games and Operator Space Theory
- Joint measurability of quantum effects and the matrix diamond
- Universal gaps for XOR games from estimates on tensor norm ratios
- Estimating the expectation values of spin 1/2 observables with finite resources
- Incompatibility in general probabilistic theories, generalized spectrahedra, and tensor norms
- A tensor norm approach to quantum compatibility