Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive

Abstract

We attempt to make superdeterminism more intuitive, notably by simulating a deterministic model system, a billiard game. In this system an initial 'bang' correlates all events, just as in the superdeterministic universe. We introduce the notions of 'strong' and 'soft' superdeterminism, in order to clarify debates in the literature. Based on the analogy with billiards, we show that superdeterministic correlations may exist as a matter of principle, but be undetectable for all practical purposes. This allows us to counter classical objections to superdeterminism such as the claim that it would be at odds with the scientific method, and with the construction of new theories. Finally, we show that probability theory, as a physical theory, indicates that superdeterminism has a greater explanatory power than its competitors: it can coherently answer questions for which other positions remain powerless.

arXiv commentPaper presented at the conference "Superdeterminism and Retrocausality", Bonn, May 17-20, 2022, cf. https://superdetermined.org/

References in corpus (13)

• The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning
• Violation of local realism with freedom of choice
• Rethinking Superdeterminism
• Action principle for cellular automata and the linearity of quantum mechanics
• Bell's Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions
• Fast Vacuum Fluctuations and the Emergence of Quantum Mechanics
• Testing super-deterministic hidden variables theories
• Non-signaling deterministic models for non-local correlations have to be uncomputable
• A Toy Model for Local and Deterministic Wave-function Collapse
• Are Hidden-Variable Theories for Pilot-Wave Systems Possible ?
• Probability theory as a physical theory points to superdeterminism
• Are nonlinear discrete cellular automata compatible with quantum mechanics?
• Are quantum spins but small perturbations of ontological Ising spins?

Cited by in corpus (5)

• The wavefunction as a true ensemble
• Taxonomy for Physics Beyond Quantum Mechanics
• Are Quantum-Classical Hybrids compatible with Ontological Cellular Automata?
• Cellular automaton ontology, bits, qubits, and the Dirac equation
• Bell Meets General Philosophers of Science : Reassessing Measurement Independence