Formal limitations of sample-wise information-theoretic generalization bounds
arXiv:2205.06915 · doi:10.1109/ITW54588.2022.9965850
Abstract
Some of the tightest information-theoretic generalization bounds depend on the average information between the learned hypothesis and a single training example. However, these sample-wise bounds were derived only for expected generalization gap. We show that even for expected squared generalization gap no such sample-wise information-theoretic bounds exist. The same is true for PAC-Bayes and single-draw bounds. Remarkably, PAC-Bayes, single-draw and expected squared generalization gap bounds that depend on information in pairs of examples exist.
2022 IEEE Information Theory Workshop
References in corpus (7)
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Them
- Generalization Bounds via Information Density and Conditional Information Density
- Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative Algorithms
- Tighter risk certificates for neural networks
- On Random Subset Generalization Error Bounds and the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics Algorithm
- Tighter expected generalization error bounds via Wasserstein distance
- Information-theoretic generalization bounds for black-box learning algorithms