The Effect of Epsilon-Near-Zero (ENZ) Modes on the Casimir Interaction between Ultrathin Films
arXiv:2205.02969 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.196901
Abstract
Vacuum fluctuation-induced interactions between macroscopic metallic objects result in an attractive force between them, a phenomenon known as the Casimir effect. This force is the result of both plasmonic and photonic modes. For very thin films, field penetration through the films will modify the allowed modes. Here, we investigate the Casimir interaction between two ultrathin films from the perspective of the force distribution over real frequencies for the first time and find pronounced repulsive contributions to the force due to the highly confined and nearly dispersion-free epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) modes that only exist in ultrathin films. These contributions are found to persistently occur around the ENZ frequency of the film and are irrespective of the inter-film separation. We further associate the ENZ modes with a striking thickness dependence in the averaged force density for conductive thin films, a metric signifying a thin-film's acceleration due to Casimir effect. Our results shed light on the role of the unique vacuum fluctuation modes existing in ultrathin ENZ materials, which may offer significant potential for engineering the motion of objects in nanomechanical systems.
References in corpus (10)
- Measurement of the Casimir force between a gold sphere and silicon surface with nanoscale trench arrays
- Casimir-Lifshitz Theory and Metamaterials
- Measurement of non-monotonic Casimir forces between silicon nanostructures
- Virtual photons in imaginary time: Computing exact Casimir forces via standard numerical-electromagnetism techniques
- The Role of Surface Plasmons in The Casimir Effect
- Design of a Casimir-driven parametric amplifier
- Casimir spring and dilution in macroscopic cavity optomechanics
- Casimir Force between Atomically Thin Gold Films
- Vacuum fluctuation forces between ultra-thin films
- Frequency spectrum of the Casimir force: interpretation and a paradox