Counting and enumerating optimum cut sets for hypergraph -partitioning problems for fixed
arXiv:2204.09178
Abstract
We consider the problem of enumerating optimal solutions for two hypergraph -partitioning problems -- namely, Hypergraph--Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. The input in hypergraph -partitioning problems is a hypergraph with positive hyperedge costs along with a fixed positive integer . The goal is to find a partition of into non-empty parts -- known as a -partition -- so as to minimize an objective of interest. 1. If the objective of interest is the maximum cut value of the parts, then the problem is known as Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. A subset of hyperedges is a minmax--cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum -partition for Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. 2. If the objective of interest is the total cost of hyperedges crossing the -partition, then the problem is known as Hypergraph--Cut. A subset of hyperedges is a min--cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum -partition for Hypergraph--Cut. We give the first polynomial bound on the number of minmax--cut-sets and a polynomial-time algorithm to enumerate all of them in hypergraphs for every fixed . Our technique is strong enough to also enable an -time deterministic algorithm to enumerate all min--cut-sets in hypergraphs, thus improving on the previously known -time deterministic algorithm, where is the number of vertices and is the size of the hypergraph. The correctness analysis of our enumeration approach relies on a structural result that is a strong and unifying generalization of known structural results for Hypergraph--Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. We believe that our structural result is likely to be of independent interest in the theory of hypergraphs (and graphs).
Accepted to ICALP'22. Claims 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 in this work are similar to the claims in the proof of a structural theorem in arXiv: 2110.14815. Since the hypothesis of the theorem in this work is different from that of the theorem in arXiv: 2110.14815, complete proofs of these claims are presented. The usage of these claims in this work is also different from the usage in arXiv: 2110.14815. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2110.14815