Tabletop Experiments for Quantum Gravity Are Also Tests of the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
arXiv:2204.08064 · doi:10.1007/s10701-022-00636-z
Abstract
Recently there has been a great deal of interest in tabletop experiments intended to exhibit the quantum nature of gravity by demonstrating that it can induce entanglement. We argue that these experiments also provide new information about the interpretation of quantum mechanics: under appropriate assumptions, -complete interpretations will generally predict that these experiments will have a positive result, -nonphysical interpretations predict that these experiments will not have a positive result, and for -supplemented models there may be arguments for either outcome. We suggest that a positive outcome to these experimenst would rule out a class of quantum gravity models that we refer to as -incomplete quantum gravity (PIQG) - i.e. models of the interaction between quantum mechanics and gravity in which gravity is coupled to non-quantum beables rather than quantum beables. We review some existing PIQG models and consider what more needs to be done to make these sorts of approaches more appealing, and finally we discuss a cosmological phenomenon which could be regarded as providing evidence for PIQG models.
References in corpus (10)
- A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity
- Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity
- An effective approach to the problem of time
- On Galilean and Lorentz invariance in pilot-wave dynamics
- Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model with massive flashes
- Tests of Quantum Gravity-Induced Non-Locality via Opto-mechanical Experiments
- The sky is blue, and other reasons quantum mechanics is not underdetermined by evidence
- The multiple realizability of general relativity in quantum gravity
- Towards a test of quantum gravity with a levitated nanodiamond containing a spin
- Quantum Gravity in a Laboratory?