Comparison of Two Methods for Calculating Magnetic Helicity in the Solar Corona
arXiv:2204.04982 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5593
Abstract
Duo to the large magnetic Reynolds number, the magnetic helicity originating from the solar interior can be carried away through the photosphere into the corona. However, the relationship between the accumulated magnetic helicity flux through the photosphere and the magnetic helicity in the corona is still unclear. By selecting 36 newly emerging active regions in the 23rd solar cycle, we apply optical flow methods to derive the accumulated magnetic helicity through the photosphere () by using the sequential longitudinal magnetograms, use nonlinear force-free field extrapolation to obtain the 3D coronal magnetic field, and adopt finite volume methods to calculate the instantaneous relative magnetic helicity in the corona () by using vector magnetograms. It is found that the local correlation tracking (LCT)-based is larger than in , and that the Differential Affine Velocity Estimator-based is more consistent with than the LCT-based . is more consistent with in evaluation from than from . Moreover, systematically shows consistency with the Hemispheric Helicity Rule (over 55\%), no matter which resolution and method are used. These estimations suggest that the consistency of and is partly dependent on the resolution of the magnetograms and the calculation methods.
18 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in ApJ
References in corpus (6)
- Optimization code with weighting function for the reconstruction of coronal magnetic fields
- Preprocessing of vector magnetograph data for a non-linear force-free magnetic field reconstruction
- Tracking Vector Magnetograms with the Magnetic Induction Equation
- Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar magnetic field. Part I: Finite volume methods
- Validation and Benchmarking of a Practical Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budget Calculation in Solar Magnetic Structures
- On the reliability of magnetic energy and helicity computations based on nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field models