Why the mean anomaly at epoch is not used in tests of non-Newtonian gravity?

Abstract

The mean anomaly at epoch $\eta$ is one of the standard six Keplerian orbital elements in terms of which the motion of the two-body problem is parameterized. Along with the argument of pericenter $\omega$, $\eta$ experiences long-term rates of change induced, among other things, by general relativity and several modified models of gravity. Thus, in principle, it may be fruitfully adopted together with $\omega$ in several tests of post-Newtonian gravity performed with astronomical and astrophysical binary systems. This would allow to enhance the gravitational signature one is interested in and to disentangle some competing disturbing effects acting as sources of systematic bias. Nonetheless, for some reasons unknown to the present author, $\eta$ has never been used so far by astronomers in actual data reductions. This note aims to raise interest in the community about the possible practical use of such an orbital element or, at least, to induce experts in astronomical data processing to explicitly make clear if it is not possible to use $\eta$ for testing gravitational models and, in this case, why.

LaTex2e, 7 pages, no figures, no tables

References in corpus (7)

• f(R,T) gravity
• Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
• Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole
• The mass distribution in the Galactic Centre from interferometric astrometry of multiple stellar orbits
• Strong-field Gravity Tests with the Double Pulsar
• General Relativity and Cosmology: Unsolved Questions and Future Directions
• Accurate Measurement in the Field of the Earth of the General-Relativistic Precession of the LAGEOS II Pericenter and New Constraints on Non-Newtonian Gravity