Comment on "Nonlinear charge--voltage relationship in constant phase element" [AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 117, 153104 (2020)]

Vikash Pandey

paper

Comment on "Nonlinear charge--voltage relationship in constant phase element" [AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 117, 153104 (2020)]

arXiv:2203.04804

Abstract

In this comment, we show a dimensional inconsistency that plagues one of the main founding equations, Eq. (5), of the manuscript, [Fouda et al., AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 117, 153104 (2020)]. Also, a resolution of the inconsistency as well as a generalized yet a better version of the equation are suggested.

3 pages

Cited by in corpus (1)

Response to "Comment on 'Origin of the Curie--von Schweidler law and the fractional capacitor from time-varying capacitance [J. Pow. Sources 532 (2022) 231309]' "