Understanding European Integration with Bipartite Networks of Comparative Advantage
arXiv:2202.01080 · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac262
Abstract
Core objectives of European common market integration are convergence and economic growth, but these are hampered by redundancy, and value chain asymmetries. The challenge is how to harmonize labor division to reach global competitiveness, meanwhile bridging productivity differences across the EU. We develop a bipartite network approach to trace pairwise co-specialization, by applying the Revealed Comparative Advantage method, within and between EU15 and Central and Eastern European (CEE). This approach assesses redundancies and division of labor in the EU at the level of industries and countries. We find significant co-specialization among CEE countries but a diverging specialization between EU15 and CEE. Productivity increases in those CEE industries that have co-specialized with other CEE countries after EU accession, while co-specialization across CEE and EU15 countries is less related to productivity growth. These results show that a division of sectoral specialization can lead to productivity convergence between EU15 and CEE countries.
arXiv comment17 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables
References in corpus (13)
- The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity
- The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations
- The Statistical Physics of Real-World Networks
- Randomizing bipartite networks: the case of the World Trade Web
- The Scientific Competitiveness of Nations
- Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: an entropy-based approach
- Statistically validated network of portfolio overlaps and systemic risk
- Detecting early signs of the 2007-2008 crisis in the world trade
- Urbanization and Economic Complexity
- Breaking the spell of nestedness
- From innovation to diversification: a simple competitive model
- Grand canonical validation of the bipartite International Trade Network
- Reconstructing mesoscale network structures