No Community Can Do Everything: Why People Participate in Similar Online Communities
arXiv:2201.04271 · doi:10.1145/3512908
Abstract
Large-scale quantitative analyses have shown that individuals frequently talk to each other about similar things in different online spaces. Why do these overlapping communities exist? We provide an answer grounded in the analysis of 20 interviews with active participants in clusters of highly related subreddits. Within a broad topical area, there are a diversity of benefits an online community can confer. These include (a) specific information and discussion, (b) socialization with similar others, and (c) attention from the largest possible audience. A single community cannot meet all three needs. Our findings suggest that topical areas within an online community platform tend to become populated by groups of specialized communities with diverse sizes, topical boundaries, and rules. Compared with any single community, such systems of overlapping communities are able to provide a greater range of benefits.
arXiv commentAccepted to CSCW 2022
References in corpus (5)
- Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web
- Surviving an "Eternal September" - How an Online Community Managed a Surge of Newcomers
- Thousands of Positive Reviews: Distributed Mentoring in Online Fan Communities
- All Who Wander: On the Prevalence and Characteristics of Multi-community Engagement
- When Do People Trust Their Social Groups?
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias
- Identifying Competition and Mutualism Between Online Groups
- How founder motivations, goals, and actions influence early trajectories of online communities
- Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows Through Decentralized Social Media