Galaxy blending effects in deep imaging cosmic shear probes of cosmology
arXiv:2112.07659 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1303
Abstract
Upcoming deep imaging surveys such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time will be confronted with challenges that come with increased depth. One of the leading systematic errors in deep surveys is the blending of objects due to higher surface density in the more crowded images; a considerable fraction of the galaxies which we hope to use for cosmology analyses will overlap each other on the observed sky. In order to investigate these challenges, we emulate blending in a mock catalogue consisting of galaxies at a depth equivalent to 1.3 yr of the full 10-yr Rubin Observatory that includes effects due to weak lensing, ground-based seeing, and the uncertainties due to extraction of catalogues from imaging data. The emulated catalogue indicates that approximately 12 per cent of the observed galaxies are ``unrecognized'' blends that contain two or more objects but are detected as one. Using the positions and shears of half a billion distant galaxies, we compute shear--shear correlation functions after selecting tomographic samples in terms of both spectroscopic and photometric redshift bins. We examine the sensitivity of the cosmological parameter estimation to unrecognized blending employing both jackknife and analytical Gaussian covariance estimators. An decrease in the derived structure growth parameter is seen due to unrecognized blending in both tomographies with a slight additional bias for the photo--based tomography. This bias is greater than the statistical error in measuring .
Published version with a typo fixed
References in corpus (6)
- Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic -- unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
- Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
- DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
- ADDGALS: Simulated Sky Catalogs for Wide Field Galaxy Surveys
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations
- Effects of overlapping sources on cosmic shear estimation: Statistical sensitivity and pixel-noise bias