Galaxy blending effects in deep imaging cosmic shear probes of cosmology

Abstract

Upcoming deep imaging surveys such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time will be confronted with challenges that come with increased depth. One of the leading systematic errors in deep surveys is the blending of objects due to higher surface density in the more crowded images; a considerable fraction of the galaxies which we hope to use for cosmology analyses will overlap each other on the observed sky. In order to investigate these challenges, we emulate blending in a mock catalogue consisting of galaxies at a depth equivalent to 1.3 yr of the full 10-yr Rubin Observatory that includes effects due to weak lensing, ground-based seeing, and the uncertainties due to extraction of catalogues from imaging data. The emulated catalogue indicates that approximately 12 per cent of the observed galaxies are ``unrecognized'' blends that contain two or more objects but are detected as one. Using the positions and shears of half a billion distant galaxies, we compute shear--shear correlation functions after selecting tomographic samples in terms of both spectroscopic and photometric redshift bins. We examine the sensitivity of the cosmological parameter estimation to unrecognized blending employing both jackknife and analytical Gaussian covariance estimators. An $\sim 0.025$ decrease in the derived structure growth parameter $S_8={\sigma }_8({\Omega }_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3{)}^{0.5}$ is seen due to unrecognized blending in both tomographies with a slight additional bias for the photo-$z$-based tomography. This bias is greater than the $2\sigma$ statistical error in measuring $S_8$.

arXiv commentPublished version with a typo fixed

References in corpus (40)

• Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy
• The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package
• HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
• MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
• Stable clustering, the halo model and nonlinear cosmological power spectra
• Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
• Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic -- unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints
• CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
• Second Data Release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program
• The Hyper Suprime-Cam Software Pipeline
• Weak lensing for precision cosmology
• CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
• Core Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
• TPZ : Photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests
• Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
• Parameter inference with estimated covariance matrices
• Putting the Precision in Precision Cosmology: How accurate should your data covariance matrix be?
• Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
• The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues
• Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements
• The Effective Number Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project
• Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
• Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
• DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
• Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: weak lensing survey requirements
• Cosmic Shear Results from the Deep Lens Survey - II: Full Cosmological Parameter Constraints from Tomography
• Spectroscopic Needs for Imaging Dark Energy Experiments: Photometric Redshift Training and Calibration
• SCARLET: Source separation in multi-band images by Constrained Matrix Factorization
• Bayesian Lensing Shear Measurement
• Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an Overview
• Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration
• The Ellipticity Distribution of Ambiguously Blended Objects
• ADDGALS: Simulated Sky Catalogs for Wide Field Galaxy Surveys
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations
• Effects of overlapping sources on cosmic shear estimation: Statistical sensitivity and pixel-noise bias
• Does jackknife scale really matter for accurate large-scale structure covariances?
• Estimating Sky Level

Cited by in corpus (1)

• A Joint Roman Space Telescope and Rubin Observatory Synthetic Wide-Field Imaging Survey