Whose Ground Truth? Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Dataset Annotation
arXiv:2112.04554
Abstract
Human annotations play a crucial role in machine learning (ML) research and development. However, the ethical considerations around the processes and decisions that go into building ML datasets has not received nearly enough attention. In this paper, we survey an array of literature that provides insights into ethical considerations around crowdsourced dataset annotation. We synthesize these insights, and lay out the challenges in this space along two layers: (1) who the annotator is, and how the annotators' lived experiences can impact their annotations, and (2) the relationship between the annotators and the crowdsourcing platforms and what that relationship affords them. Finally, we put forth a concrete set of recommendations and considerations for dataset developers at various stages of the ML data pipeline: task formulation, selection of annotators, platform and infrastructure choices, dataset analysis and evaluation, and dataset documentation and release.
Cited by in corpus (6)
- "HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social media
- AI's Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Models in South Asia
- Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AI
- Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasets
- Flickr Africa: Examining Geo-Diversity in Large-Scale, Human-Centric Visual Data
- Should AI Mimic People? Understanding AI-Supported Writing Technology Among Black Users