Mobility signatures: a tool for characterizing cities using intercity mobility flows
arXiv:2112.01789 · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.822889
Abstract
Understanding the patterns of human mobility between cities has various applications from transport engineering to spatial modeling of the spreading of contagious diseases. We adopt a city-centric, data-driven perspective to quantify such patterns and introduce the mobility signature as a tool for understanding how a city (or a region) is embedded in the wider mobility network. We demonstrate the potential of the mobility signature approach through two applications that build on mobile-phone-based data from Finland. First, we use mobility signatures to show that the well-known radiation model is more accurate for mobility flows associated with larger cities, while the traditional gravity model appears a better fit for less populated areas. Second, we illustrate how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic disrupted the mobility patterns in Finland in the spring of 2020. These two cases demonstrate the ability of the mobility signatures to quickly capture features of mobility flows that are harder to extract using more traditional methods.
arXiv comment13 pages, 5 figures
References in corpus (12)
- A universal model for mobility and migration patterns
- Human Mobility: Models and Applications
- COVID-19 lockdown induces disease-mitigating structural changes in mobility networks
- The persistence of social signatures in human communication
- Uncovering patterns of inter-urban trip and spatial interaction from social media check-in data
- Understanding Road Usage Patterns in Urban Areas
- Gravity vs radiation model: on the importance of scale and heterogeneity in commuting flows
- Systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models
- Uncovering the spatial structure of mobility networks
- Predicting commuter flows in spatial networks using a radiation model based on temporal ranges
- Uncovering the socioeconomic facets of human mobility
- Multichannel social signatures and persistent features of ego networks