Quantum state preparation by adiabatic evolution with customized gates

Abstract

Quantum state preparation by adiabatic evolution is currently rendered ineffective by the long implementation times of the underlying quantum circuits, comparable to the decoherence time of present and near-term quantum devices. These implementation times can be significantly reduced by realizing the evolution with a minimal number of customized gates. Employing a realistic model of a two-qubit processor, we carried out classical device-level simulations of the adiabatic evolution of a two-spin system implemented with customized two-qubit gates. These device-level simulations were compared with (experimental) ones solving the same problem on IBMQ systems. When used to emulate the IBMQ quantum circuit, our device-level simulations reached state fidelities ranging from 65% to 85%, similar to the actual performance of a diverse set of IBMQ devices.When we reduced the implementation time by using a minimal number of customized gates, however, the loss of fidelity was reduced by at least a factor of four, allowing us to accurately extract the energy of the target state. This improvement is enough to render adiabatic evolution useful for quantum state preparation for small systems or as a preconditioner for other state preparation methods.

12 pages, 10 figures

References in corpus (4)

• Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
• QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems
• Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits
• Quantum simulation of time-dependent Hamiltonians and the convenient illusion of Hilbert space

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Variational counterdiabatic driving of the Hubbard model for ground-state preparation
• A quantum-classical co-processing protocol towards simulating nuclear reactions on contemporary quantum hardware
• Towards a Quantum Simulation of Nonlinear Sigma Models with a Topological Term
• Scattering phase shifts from a quantum computer
• Quantum techniques for eigenvalue problems
• Cost of Emulating a Small Quantum Annealing Problem in the Circuit-Model
• Adiabatic manipulation of a system interacting with a spin-bath
• Robustness of the quantum Mpemba effect against state-preparation errors
• Quantum adiabaticity in many-body systems and almost-orthogonality in complementary subspace
• Unraveling Rodeo Algorithm Through the Zeeman Model