Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory'"
arXiv:2111.11659 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027102
Abstract
We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [arXiv:2107.10598] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.
arXiv comment4 pages
References in corpus (13)
- Kelvin Wave Cascade and Decay of Superfluid Turbulence
- Localness of energy cascade in hydrodynamic turbulence, II. Sharp spectral filter
- Spectrum of Kelvin-wave turbulence in superfluids
- Cascades and Dissipative Anomalies in Compressible Fluid Turbulence
- Dual cascade and dissipation mechanisms in helical quantum turbulence
- Intermittency of quantum turbulence with superfluid fractions from 0% to 96%
- Quantitative estimation of effective viscosity in quantum turbulence
- Grid superfluid turbulence and intermittency at very low temperature
- Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager "ideal turbulence" theory
- Review of the Onsager "Ideal Turbulence" Theory
- Non-Abelian Quantum Turbulence in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Van der Waals Cascade in Supercritical Turbulence near a Critical Point
- Comment on "Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory''