Toxicity Detection can be Sensitive to the Conversational Context

Abstract

User posts whose perceived toxicity depends on the conversational context are rare in current toxicity detection datasets. Hence, toxicity detectors trained on existing datasets will also tend to disregard context, making the detection of context-sensitive toxicity harder when it does occur. We construct and publicly release a dataset of 10,000 posts with two kinds of toxicity labels: (i) annotators considered each post with the previous one as context; and (ii) annotators had no additional context. Based on this, we introduce a new task, context sensitivity estimation, which aims to identify posts whose perceived toxicity changes if the context (previous post) is also considered. We then evaluate machine learning systems on this task, showing that classifiers of practical quality can be developed, and we show that data augmentation with knowledge distillation can improve the performance further. Such systems could be used to enhance toxicity detection datasets with more context-dependent posts, or to suggest when moderators should consider the parent posts, which often may be unnecessary and may otherwise introduce significant additional cost.

arXiv comment13 pages, 8 figures

References in corpus (5)

• Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
• Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
• Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisis
• Context-Aware Attention for Understanding Twitter Abuse
• Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detection