Limits on inference of gravitational entanglement
arXiv:2111.00936 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013024
Abstract
Combining gravity with quantum mechanics remains one of the biggest challenges of physics. In the past years, experiments with opto-mechanical systems have been proposed that may give indirect clues about the quantum nature of gravity. In a recent variation of such tests [D. Carney et al., Phys.Rev.X Quantum 2, 030330 (2021)], the authors propose to gravitationally entangle an atom interferometer with a mesoscopic oscillator. The interaction results in periodic drops and revivals of the interferometeric visibility, which under specific assumptions indicate the gravitational generation of entanglement. Here we study semi-classical models of the atom interferometer that can reproduce the same effect. We show that the core signature -- periodic collapses and revivals of the visibility -- can appear if the atom is subject to a random unitary channel, including the case where the oscillator is fully classical and situations even without explicit modelling of the oscillator. We also show that the non-classicality of the oscillator vanishes unless the system is very close to its ground state, and even when the system is in the ground state, the non-classicality is limited by the coupling strength. Our results thus indicate that deducing entanglement from the proposed experiment is very challenging, since fulfilling and verifying the non-classicality assumptions is a significant challenge on its own right.
7 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (6)
- A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity
- Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity
- Gravitational Decoherence
- Creating and Verifying a Quantum Superposition in a Micro-optomechanical System
- Two-slit diffraction with highly charged particles: Niels Bohr's consistency argument that the electromagnetic field must be quantized
- Do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity?