Cosmographic parameters in model-independent approaches

Abstract

Cosmographic approach, a Taylor expansion of the Hubble function, has been used as a model-independent method to investigate the evolution of the universe in the presence of cosmological data. Apart from possible technical problems like the radius of convergence, there is an ongoing debates about the tensions appear when one investigates some high redshift cosmological data. In this work, we consider two common data sets namely SNIa (Pantheon sample) and the Hubble data to investigate advantages and disadvantages of the cosmographic approach. To do this, we obtain the evolution of cosmographic functions using cosmographic method as well as two other well known model-independent approaches namely, the Gaussian process and the Genetic algorithm. We also assume $\Lambda$CDM model as concordance model to compare the results of mentioned approaches. Our results indicate that the results of cosmography comparing with the other approaches, are not exact enough. Considering the Hubble data which is less certain, the results of $q_0$ and $j_0$ obtained in cosmography, provides a tension at more than $3\sigma$ away from the best result of $\Lambda$CDM. Assuming both of data samples in different approaches we show that the cosmographic approach, because of providing some biased results, is not the best approach for reconstruction of cosmographic functions, especially at higher redshifts.

arXiv comment12 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in APJ

References in corpus (66)

• Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
• Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
• Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
• Dynamics of dark energy
• Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
• f(R) Theories Of Gravity
• Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP
• A Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state
• The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 Galaxy Sample
• Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
• Statefinder -- a new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy
• Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter
• Exploring the Expanding Universe and Dark Energy using the Statefinder Diagnostic
• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Lyα forest of BOSS DR11 quasars
• The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
• Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant
• Quintessence as a run-away dilaton
• Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian processes
• The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z=0.57 from anisotropic clustering
• Extended Gravity Cosmography
• Hubble parameter measurement constraints on the redshift of the deceleration-acceleration transition, dynamical dark energy, and space curvature
• A Lower Growth Rate from Recent Redshift Space Distortion Measurements than Expected from Planck
• Gaussian Process Cosmography
• To H0 or not to H0?
• $H_0$ from cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian Processes and the novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method
• FRW Cosmology in F(R,T) gravity
• On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference
• Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions
• Accelerated Expansion of the Universe in Non-minimally Coupled Gravity
• Cosmography in $f(Q)$ gravity
• Measuring the Speed of Sound of Quintessence
• High-redshift cosmography: auxiliary variables versus Padé polynomials
• General Cosmography Model with Spatial Curvature
• Model independent constraints on dark energy evolution from low-redshift observations
• Tension with the flat ΛCDM model from a high redshift Hubble Diagram of supernovae, quasars and gamma-ray bursts
• A model-independent determination of the Hubble constant from lensed quasars and supernovae using Gaussian process regression
• Comprehensive cosmographic analysis by Markov Chain Method
• Reconstructing Functions and Estimating Parameters with Artificial Neural Networks: A Test with the Hubble Parameter and SNe Ia
• A new perspective on Dark Energy modeling via Genetic Algorithms
• Dark sector interaction and the supernova absolute magnitude tension
• A model independent null test on the cosmological constant
• Vacuum models with a linear and a quadratic term in H: structure formation and number counts analysis
• What can Machine Learning tell us about the background expansion of the Universe?
• Rational approximations of $f(R)$ cosmography through Padé polynomials
• Measurements of $H_0$ and reconstruction of the dark energy properties from a model-independent joint analysis
• Genetic Algorithms and Supernovae Type Ia Analysis
• Can dark energy be expressed as a power series of the Hubble parameter?
• Cosmography approach to dark energy cosmologies: new constrains using the Hubble diagrams of supernovae, quasars and gamma-ray bursts
• Novel null tests for the spatial curvature and homogeneity of the Universe and their machine learning reconstructions
• Comparison between different methods of model selection in cosmology
• Cosmological constraints on dark energy in light of gravitational wave bounds
• A Bayesian comparison between $\Lambda$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
• Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning
• Investigating the Hubble Constant Tension -- Two Numbers in the Standard Cosmological Model
• Can Holographic dark energy models fit the observational data?
• Agegraphic dark energy: growth index and cosmological implications
• Searching for the Evidence of Dynamical Dark Energy
• Does $\Lambda$CDM really be in tension with the Hubble diagram data?
• Observational constraints on the oscillating dark energy cosmologies
• Spherical collapse model in agegraphic dark energy cosmologies
• Structure formation in dark energy cosmologies described by PADE parameterization
• Constraints on kinematic parameters at $z\ne 0$

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Reconstruction of the dark sectors' interaction: A model-independent inference and forecast from GW standard sirens
• Can high-redshift Hubble diagrams rule out the standard model of cosmology in the context of cosmographic method?
• Null test for cosmic curvature using Gaussian process
• From Hubble to Snap Parameters: A Gaussian Process Reconstruction
• Model-independent estimation of the cosmography parameters using cosmic chronometers
• Constraints on Cosmographic Functions of Cosmic Chronometers Data Using Gaussian Processes
• On the uniqueness of $\Lambda$CDM-like evolution for homogeneous and isotropic cosmology in General Relativity