Cosmographic parameters in model-independent approaches

Abstract

Cosmographic approach, a Taylor expansion of the Hubble function, has been used as a model-independent method to investigate the evolution of the universe in the presence of cosmological data. Apart from possible technical problems like the radius of convergence, there is an ongoing debates about the tensions appear when one investigates some high redshift cosmological data. In this work, we consider two common data sets namely SNIa (Pantheon sample) and the Hubble data to investigate advantages and disadvantages of the cosmographic approach. To do this, we obtain the evolution of cosmographic functions using cosmographic method as well as two other well known model-independent approaches namely, the Gaussian process and the Genetic algorithm. We also assume $\Lambda$CDM model as concordance model to compare the results of mentioned approaches. Our results indicate that the results of cosmography comparing with the other approaches, are not exact enough. Considering the Hubble data which is less certain, the results of $q_0$ and $j_0$ obtained in cosmography, provides a tension at more than $3\sigma$ away from the best result of $\Lambda$CDM. Assuming both of data samples in different approaches we show that the cosmographic approach, because of providing some biased results, is not the best approach for reconstruction of cosmographic functions, especially at higher redshifts.

12 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in APJ

References in corpus (24)

• Dynamics of dark energy
• Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Lyα forest of BOSS DR11 quasars
• Extended Gravity Cosmography
• Hubble parameter measurement constraints on the redshift of the deceleration-acceleration transition, dynamical dark energy, and space curvature
• Gaussian Process Cosmography
• FRW Cosmology in F(R,T) gravity
• Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions
• Accelerated Expansion of the Universe in Non-minimally Coupled Gravity
• Cosmography in $f(Q)$ gravity
• A new perspective on Dark Energy modeling via Genetic Algorithms
• Dark sector interaction and the supernova absolute magnitude tension
• Vacuum models with a linear and a quadratic term in H: structure formation and number counts analysis
• Measurements of $H_0$ and reconstruction of the dark energy properties from a model-independent joint analysis
• Cosmography approach to dark energy cosmologies: new constrains using the Hubble diagrams of supernovae, quasars and gamma-ray bursts
• Comparison between different methods of model selection in cosmology
• A Bayesian comparison between $\Lambda$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
• Agegraphic dark energy: growth index and cosmological implications
• Searching for the Evidence of Dynamical Dark Energy
• Observational constraints on the oscillating dark energy cosmologies
• Spherical collapse model in agegraphic dark energy cosmologies
• Structure formation in dark energy cosmologies described by PADE parameterization

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Can high-redshift Hubble diagrams rule out the standard model of cosmology in the context of cosmographic method?
• Null test for cosmic curvature using Gaussian process
• From Hubble to Snap Parameters: A Gaussian Process Reconstruction
• Model-independent estimation of the cosmography parameters using cosmic chronometers
• On the uniqueness of $\Lambda$CDM-like evolution for homogeneous and isotropic cosmology in General Relativity