Quantifying incompatibility of quantum measurements through non-commutativity

Abstract

The existence of incompatible measurements, i.e. measurements which cannot be performed simultaneously on a single copy of a quantum state, constitutes an important distinction between quantum mechanics and classical theories. While incompatibility might at first glance seem like an obstacle, it turns to be a necessary ingredient to achieve the so-called quantum advantage in various operational tasks like random access codes or key distribution. To improve our understanding of how to quantify incompatibility of quantum measurements, we define and explore a family of incompatibility measures based on non-commutativity. We investigate some basic properties of these measures, we show that they satisfy some natural information-processing requirements and we fully characterize the pairs which achieve the highest incompatibility (in a fixed dimension). We also consider the behavior of our measures under different types of compositions. Finally, to link our new measures to existing results, we relate them to a robustness-based incompatibility measure and two operational scenarios: random access codes and entropic uncertainty relations.

20 pages, 3 figures, comments welcome, v2: bibliography updated

References in corpus (8)

• Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the EPR Paradox
• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering provides the advantage in entanglement-assisted subchannel discrimination with one-way measurements
• Non-disturbing quantum measurements
• Verifying the quantumness of a channel with an untrusted device
• Kirkwood-Dirac nonclassicality, support uncertainty and complete incompatibility
• Layers of classicality in the compatibility of measurements
• Rigidity of superdense coding
• Characterizing incompatibility of quantum measurements via their Naimark extensions