Fast Passage Re-ranking with Contextualized Exact Term Matching and Efficient Passage Expansion
arXiv:2108.08513
Abstract
BERT-based information retrieval models are expensive, in both time (query latency) and computational resources (energy, hardware cost), making many of these models impractical especially under resource constraints. The reliance on a query encoder that only performs tokenization and on the pre-processing of passage representations at indexing, has allowed the recently proposed TILDE method to overcome the high query latency issue typical of BERT-based models. This however is at the expense of a lower effectiveness compared to other BERT-based re-rankers and dense retrievers. In addition, the original TILDE method is characterised by indexes with a very high memory footprint, as it expands each passage into the size of the BERT vocabulary. In this paper, we propose TILDEv2, a new model that stems from the original TILDE but that addresses its limitations. TILDEv2 relies on contextualized exact term matching with expanded passages. This requires to only store in the index the score of tokens that appear in the expanded passages (rather than all the vocabulary), thus producing indexes that are 99% smaller than those of TILDE. This matching mechanism also improves ranking effectiveness by 24%, without adding to the query latency. This makes TILDEv2 the state-of-the-art passage re-ranking method for CPU-only environments, capable of maintaining query latency below 100ms on commodity hardware.
10 pages
References in corpus (7)
- Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
- Deeper Text Understanding for IR with Contextual Neural Language Modeling
- Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERT
- Context-Aware Sentence/Passage Term Importance Estimation For First Stage Retrieval
- A Few Brief Notes on DeepImpact, COIL, and a Conceptual Framework for Information Retrieval Techniques
- RepBERT: Contextualized Text Embeddings for First-Stage Retrieval
- Learning Passage Impacts for Inverted Indexes
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Wacky Weights in Learned Sparse Representations and the Revenge of Score-at-a-Time Query Evaluation
- To Interpolate or not to Interpolate: PRF, Dense and Sparse Retrievers
- Implicit Feedback for Dense Passage Retrieval: A Counterfactual Approach
- Dealing with Typos for BERT-based Passage Retrieval and Ranking