A critical appraisal of the singularity theorems
arXiv:2108.07296 · doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0174
Abstract
The 2020 Nobel prize in Physics has revived the interest in the singularity theorems and, in particular, in the Penrose theorem published in 1965. In this short paper I briefly review the main ideas behind the theorems and then proceed to an evaluation of their hypotheses and implications. I will try to dispel some common misconceptions about the theorems and their conclusions, as well as to convey some of their rarely mentioned consequences. In particular, a discussion of spacetime extensions in relation to the theorems is provided. The nature of the singularity inside black holes is also analyzed.
15 pages, 4 figures. Invited review for the Theme issue "The future of mathematical cosmology" , submitted to Phil. Trans. A
References in corpus (7)
- Singularity Theorems and Their Consequences
- The 1965 Penrose singularity theorem
- Singularities and Quantum Gravity
- Quest for realistic non-singular black-hole geometries: Regular-center type
- From Geometry to Numerics: interdisciplinary aspects in mathematical and numerical relativity
- A singularity theorem based on spatial averages
- A New Type of Singularity Theorem
Cited by in corpus (10)
- The singularity theorems of General Relativity and their low regularity extensions
- The Hawking-Penrose singularity theorem for -Lorentzian metrics
- Compact objects with scalar charge embedded in a magnetic or electric field in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories
- Spacetime singularities and curvature blow-ups
- How Much NEC Breaking Can the Universe Endure?
- Hawking-type singularity theorems for worldvolume energy inequalities
- Power-Law Bounces in Gravity: Analysis of the Ekpyrosis and Accelerating Regimes
- Singularity and differentiability at the origin of static and spherically symmetric black holes
- Penrose's singularity theorem and the Kerr space-time
- Nonsingular spherically symmetric black-hole model with holonomy corrections