The Sharpe predictor for fairness in machine learning

Abstract

In machine learning (ML) applications, unfair predictions may discriminate against a minority group. Most existing approaches for fair machine learning (FML) treat fairness as a constraint or a penalization term in the optimization of a ML model, which does not lead to the discovery of the complete landscape of the trade-offs among learning accuracy and fairness metrics, and does not integrate fairness in a meaningful way. Recently, we have introduced a new paradigm for FML based on Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimization (SMOO), where accuracy and fairness metrics stand as conflicting objectives to be optimized simultaneously. The entire trade-offs range is defined as the Pareto front of the SMOO problem, which can then be efficiently computed using stochastic-gradient type algorithms. SMOO also allows defining and computing new meaningful predictors for FML, a novel one being the Sharpe predictor that we introduce and explore in this paper, and which gives the highest ratio of accuracy-to-unfairness. Inspired from SMOO in finance, the Sharpe predictor for FML provides the highest prediction return (accuracy) per unit of prediction risk (unfairness).

References in corpus (9)

• Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
• Fairness in Machine Learning
• On Fairness and Calibration
• A Convex Framework for Fair Regression
• Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspective
• Stochastic Gradient Descent with Biased but Consistent Gradient Estimators
• Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For Healthcare
• The stochastic multi-gradient algorithm for multi-objective optimization and its application to supervised machine learning
• A Stochastic Alternating Balance $k$-Means Algorithm for Fair Clustering