Re-evaluation of of the normalised Friedmann-Lema\^ıtre-Robertson-Walker model: Implications for Hubble constant determinations
arXiv:2108.05728 · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2021.101609
Abstract
The description of spacetime is an fundamental problem of cosmology. We explain why the current assignments of spacetime geometries for of the Friedmann-Lema\^ıtre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model are probably incorrect and suggest more useful descriptions. We show that represents not only curvature but the influence of matter density on the extent of spacetime between massive objects. Recent analyses of supernovae type Ia (SNe Ia) and HII/GEHR data with the FLRW model present the best fits with a small value for and a large . These results are consistent with our Universe exhibiting sparse matter density and quasi-Euclidean geometry and the small value agrees with Big Bang nucleosynthesis calculations. We suggest the geometry of our current Universe is better described by a value for 1 rather than 0. As an example we extend the FLRW model towards the Big Bang and discover a simple explanation of how matter creation developed into the currently geometrically flat Universe with sparse, homogeneous, isotropic matter and energy distributions. Assigning to describe quasi-Euclidean spacetime geometry is also useful for estimating and should help resolve the tension surrounding current estimates by different investigators.
arXiv comment32 pages, 5 figures, 1 table
References in corpus (33)
- Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
- Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
- The Case for a Positive Cosmological Lambda-term
- The Cosmological Constant
- Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
- Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
- A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
- Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015
- Dark Energy after GW170817: dead ends and the road ahead
- The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
- Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant
- Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
- Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Predictions for Precision Cosmology
- Inflationary Cosmology
- Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013
- Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration
- What Is The BBN Prediction for the Baryon Density and How Reliable Is It?
- Experiment to detect dark energy forces using atom interferometry
- Inflationary schism after Planck2013
- Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
- Early-type Host Galaxies of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Evidence for Luminosity Evolution in Supernova Cosmology
- Cosmology Intertwined IV: The Age of the Universe and its Curvature
- Lecture Notes in Cosmology
- Apparent cosmic acceleration from type Ia supernovae
- Chaotic Inflation in Supergravity after Planck and BICEP2
- On the relevance of matter and glue dynamics for baryon number fluctuations
- Inflationary Cosmology: From Theory to Observations
- Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? All signs still point to yes a local dipole anisotropy cannot explain dark energy
- Model-independent curvature determination with 21cm intensity mapping experiments
- Significant Luminosity Differences of Two Twin Type Ia Supernovae
- Galaxy Formation Efficiency and the Multiverse Explanation of the Cosmological Constant with EAGLE Simulations
- Constraining Density Fluctuations with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in the Era of Precision Cosmology
- The Cosmological Constant Constrained with Union2.1 Supernovae Type Ia Data. Derivation and evaluation of several FRW and Carmeli models presenting underwhelming support for the standard model