Learning strange attractors with reservoir systems
arXiv:2108.05024 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ace492
Abstract
This paper shows that the celebrated Embedding Theorem of Takens is a particular case of a much more general statement according to which, randomly generated linear state-space representations of generic observations of an invertible dynamical system carry in their wake an embedding of the phase space dynamics into the chosen Euclidean state space. This embedding coincides with a natural generalized synchronization that arises in this setup and that yields a topological conjugacy between the state-space dynamics driven by the generic observations of the dynamical system and the dynamical system itself. This result provides additional tools for the representation, learning, and analysis of chaotic attractors and sheds additional light on the reservoir computing phenomenon that appears in the context of recurrent neural networks.
arXiv comment36 pages, 11 figures
References in corpus (11)
- Recent Advances in Physical Reservoir Computing: A Review
- Using Machine Learning to Replicate Chaotic Attractors and Calculate Lyapunov Exponents from Data
- Next Generation Reservoir Computing
- Attractor Reconstruction by Machine Learning
- Embedding and Approximation Theorems for Echo State Networks
- Using reservoir computers to distinguish chaotic signals
- Echo State Networks trained by Tikhonov least squares are L2(μ) approximators of ergodic dynamical systems
- Chaos on compact manifolds: Differentiable synchronizations beyond the Takens theorem
- Learn to Synchronize, Synchronize to Learn
- Memory and forecasting capacities of nonlinear recurrent networks
- Stability and Memory-loss go Hand-in-Hand: Three Results in Dynamics & Computation
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Catch-22s of reservoir computing
- Reservoir Computing for Macroeconomic Forecasting with Mixed Frequency Data
- Embedding Information onto a Dynamical System
- Reduced-order adaptive synchronization in a chaotic neural network with parameter mismatch: A dynamical system vs. machine learning approach
- Limits of Learning Dynamical Systems
- Thermodynamic limit in learning period three
- Input-dependence in quantum reservoir computing
- State-space systems as dynamic generative models