Association between productivity and journal impact across disciplines and career age

Abstract

The association between productivity and impact of scientific production is a long-standing debate in science that remains controversial and poorly understood. Here we present a large-scale analysis of the association between yearly publication numbers and average journal-impact metrics for the Brazilian scientific elite. We find this association to be discipline-specific, career-age dependent, and similar among researchers with outlier and non-outlier performance. Outlier researchers either outperform in productivity or journal prestige, but they rarely do so in both categories. Non-outliers also follow this trend and display negative correlations between productivity and journal prestige but with discipline-dependent intensity. Our research indicates that academics are averse to simultaneous changes in their productivity and journal-prestige levels over consecutive career years. We also find that career patterns concerning productivity and journal prestige are discipline-specific, having in common a raise of productivity with career age for most disciplines and a higher chance of outperforming in journal impact during early career stages.

arXiv comment14 two-column pages, 4 figures, supplementary information; accepted for publication in Physical Review Research

References in corpus (5)

• Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF
• Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?
• Inferring the causal effect of journals on citations
• Impact Factors and the Central Limit Theorem: Why Citation Averages Are Scale Dependent
• Impact Factor volatility to a single paper: A comprehensive analysis

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Universal productivity patterns in research careers
• Consistency pays off in science
• Gender shapes the relationship between productivity and journal prestige in science