Adaptation and Generalization for Unknown Sensitive Factors of Variations
arXiv:2107.13625
Abstract
Assured AI in unrestricted settings is a critical problem. Our framework addresses AI assurance challenges lying at the intersection of domain adaptation, fairness, and counterfactuals analysis, operating via the discovery and intervention on factors of variations in data (e.g. weather or illumination conditions) that significantly affect the robustness of AI models. Robustness is understood here as insensitivity of the model performance to variations in sensitive factors. Sensitive factors are traditionally set in a supervised setting, whereby factors are known a-priori (e.g. for fairness this could be factors like sex or race). In contrast, our motivation is real-life scenarios where less, or nothing, is actually known a-priori about certain factors that cause models to fail. This leads us to consider various settings (unsupervised, domain generalization, semi-supervised) that correspond to different degrees of incomplete knowledge about those factors. Therefore, our two step approach works by a) discovering sensitive factors that cause AI systems to fail in a unsupervised fashion, and then b) intervening models to lessen these factor's influence. Our method considers 3 interventions consisting of Augmentation, Coherence, and Adversarial Interventions (ACAI). We demonstrate the ability for interventions on discovered/source factors to generalize to target/real factors. We also demonstrate how adaptation to real factors of variations can be performed in the semi-supervised case where some target factor labels are known, via automated intervention selection. Experiments show that our approach improves on baseline models, with regard to achieving optimal utility vs. sensitivity/robustness tradeoffs.
References in corpus (10)
- Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
- Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
- Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
- Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representations
- On Fairness and Calibration
- Practical Blind Membership Inference Attack via Differential Comparisons
- Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inference
- Addressing Artificial Intelligence Bias in Retinal Disease Diagnostics
- Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matching
- Defending Medical Image Diagnostics against Privacy Attacks using Generative Methods