Renewable Energy Targets and Unintended Storage Cycling: Implications for Energy Modeling
arXiv:2107.13380 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104002
Abstract
To decarbonize the economy, many governments have set targets for the use of renewable energy sources. These are often formulated as relative shares of electricity demand or supply. Implementing respective constraints in energy models is a surprisingly delicate issue. They may cause a modeling artifact of excessive electricity storage use. We introduce this phenomenon as 'unintended storage cycling', which can be detected in case of simultaneous storage charging and discharging. In this paper, we provide an analytical representation of different approaches for implementing minimum renewable share constraints in models, and show how these may lead to unintended storage cycling. Using a parsimonious optimization model, we quantify related distortions of optimal dispatch and investment decisions as well as market prices, and identify important drivers of the phenomenon. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to avoid the distorting effects of unintended storage cycling in energy modeling.
Update of Table 1 and some minor edits. This is the version that is also available at SSRN under http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920668
References in corpus (7)
- PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis
- Optimal supply chains and power sector benefits of green hydrogen
- Decreasing market value of variable renewables can be avoided by policy action
- The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage
- A graph-based formulation for modeling macro-energy systems
- Beyond cost reduction: Improving the value of energy storage in electricity systems
- DIETERpy: a Python framework for The Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables