Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutions

Abstract

Machine learning is expected to fuel significant improvements in medical care. To ensure that fundamental principles such as beneficence, respect for human autonomy, prevention of harm, justice, privacy, and transparency are respected, medical machine learning systems must be developed responsibly. Many high-level declarations of ethical principles have been put forth for this purpose, but there is a severe lack of technical guidelines explicating the practical consequences for medical machine learning. Similarly, there is currently considerable uncertainty regarding the exact regulatory requirements placed upon medical machine learning systems. This survey provides an overview of the technical and procedural challenges involved in creating medical machine learning systems responsibly and in conformity with existing regulations, as well as possible solutions to address these challenges. First, a brief review of existing regulations affecting medical machine learning is provided, showing that properties such as safety, robustness, reliability, privacy, security, transparency, explainability, and nondiscrimination are all demanded already by existing law and regulations - albeit, in many cases, to an uncertain degree. Next, the key technical obstacles to achieving these desirable properties are discussed, as well as important techniques to overcome these obstacles in the medical context. We notice that distribution shift, spurious correlations, model underspecification, uncertainty quantification, and data scarcity represent severe challenges in the medical context. Promising solution approaches include the use of large and representative datasets and federated learning as a means to that end, the careful exploitation of domain knowledge, the use of inherently transparent models, comprehensive out-of-distribution model testing and verification, as well as algorithmic impact assessments.

References in corpus (20)

• Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
• Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learn
• Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
• What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
• On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness
• Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning
• Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?
• Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims
• Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomy
• Split Learning for collaborative deep learning in healthcare
• Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap
• Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI
• An Evaluation Toolkit to Guide Model Selection and Cohort Definition in Causal Inference
• Calibrating Healthcare AI: Towards Reliable and Interpretable Deep Predictive Models
• Impact of Accuracy on Model Interpretations
• Algorithmic Bias and Data Bias: Understanding the Relation between Distributionally Robust Optimization and Data Curation
• Contestable Black Boxes
• Calibrating Deep Neural Network Classifiers on Out-of-Distribution Datasets
• Safety design concepts for statistical machine learning components toward accordance with functional safety standards

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiology
• Twenty-Four Years of Empirical Research on Trust in AI: A Bibliometric Review of Trends, Overlooked Issues, and Future Directions
• Robust and Explainable Framework to Address Data Scarcity in Diagnostic Imaging