Intersectional Bias in Causal Language Models

Abstract

To examine whether intersectional bias can be observed in language generation, we examine \emph{GPT-2} and \emph{GPT-NEO} models, ranging in size from 124 million to ~2.7 billion parameters. We conduct an experiment combining up to three social categories - gender, religion and disability - into unconditional or zero-shot prompts used to generate sentences that are then analysed for sentiment. Our results confirm earlier tests conducted with auto-regressive causal models, including the \emph{GPT} family of models. We also illustrate why bias may be resistant to techniques that target single categories (e.g. gender, religion and race), as it can also manifest, in often subtle ways, in texts prompted by concatenated social categories. To address these difficulties, we suggest technical and community-based approaches need to combine to acknowledge and address complex and intersectional language model bias.

18 pages, 4 figures

References in corpus (8)

• Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
• NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit
• The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling
• Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Review
• Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
• Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
• Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddings
• Intersectional Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Datasets