Dynamics of Social Balance on Networks: The Emergence of Multipolar Societies
arXiv:2107.03706 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034303
Abstract
Within the context of social balance theory, much attention has been paid to the attainment and stability of unipolar or bipolar societies. However, multipolar societies are commonplace in the real world, despite the fact that the mechanism of their emergence is much less explored. Here, we investigate the evolution of a society of interacting agents with friendly (positive) and enmity (negative) relations into a final stable multipolar state. Triads are assigned energy according to the degree of tension they impose on the network. Agents update their connections in order to decrease the total energy (tension) of the system, on average. Our approach is to consider a variable energy for triads which are entirely made of negative relations. We show that the final state of the system depends on the initial density of the friendly links . For initial densities greater than an dependent threshold unipolar (paradise) state is reached. However, for multi-polar and bipolar states can emerge. We observe that the number of stable final poles increases with decreasing where the first transition from bipolar to multipolar society occurs at . We end the paper by providing a mean-field calculation that provides an estimate for the critical ( dependent) initial positive link density, which is consistent with our simulations.
References in corpus (11)
- Statistical physics of social dynamics
- Statistical physics of human cooperation
- Multirelational Organization of Large-scale Social Networks in an Online World
- Dynamics of Social Balance on Networks
- Social Balance on Networks: The Dynamics of Friendship and Enmity
- Epidemic spreading on evolving signed networks
- Reducing Frustration in Spin Systems: Social Balance as an XOR-SAT problem
- Glassy states of aging social networks
- Competitive Balance Theory: Modeling conflict of interest in a heterogeneous network
- Heider Balance under Disordered Triadic Interactions
- Reply to "Comment on 'Phase transition in a network model of social balance with Glauber dynamics' "