Effect of Systematic Uncertainty Estimation on the Muon $g-2$ Anomaly

Abstract

The statistical significance that characterizes a discrepancy between a measurement and theoretical prediction is usually calculated assuming that the statistical and systematic uncertainties are known. Many types of systematic uncertainties are, however, estimated on the basis of approximate procedures and thus the values of the assigned errors are themselves uncertain. Here the impact of the uncertainty {\it on the assigned uncertainty} is investigated in the context of the muon $g-2$ anomaly. The significance of the observed discrepancy between the Standard Model prediction of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment and measured values are shown to decrease substantially if the relative uncertainty in the uncertainty assigned to the Standard Model prediction exceeds around 30\%. The reduction in sensitivity increases for higher significance, so that establishing a $5\sigma$ effect will require not only small uncertainties but the uncertainties themselves must be estimated accurately to correspond to one standard deviation.

arXiv comment6 pages, 2 figures

References in corpus (7)

• Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL
• Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
• The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model
• Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD
• A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to $\mathbf{\alpha }({\mathbf{m}}_{\mathbf{Z}}^2)$
• Statistical Models with Uncertain Error Parameters
• Statistical Challenges for Searches for New Physics at the LHC

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Higher-order asymptotic corrections and their application to the Gamma Variance Model
• Theory of Muon g-2