paper

Reconnection and particle acceleration in 3D current sheet evolution in moderately-magnetized astrophysical pair plasma

arXiv:2106.02790 · doi:10.1017/S0022377821001185

Abstract

Magnetic reconnection, a plasma process converting magnetic energy to particle kinetic energy, is often invoked to explain magnetic energy releases powering high-energy flares in astrophysical sources including pulsar wind nebulae and black hole jets. Reconnection is usually seen as the (essentially 2D) nonlinear evolution of the tearing instability disrupting a thin current sheet. To test how this process operates in 3D, we conduct a comprehensive particle-in-cell simulation study comparing 2D and 3D evolution of long, thin current sheets in moderately-magnetized, collisionless, relativistically-hot electron-positron plasma, and find dramatic differences. We first systematically characterize this process in 2D, where classic, hierarchical plasmoid-chain reconnection determines energy release, and explore a wide range of initial configurations, guide magnetic field strengths, and system sizes. We then show that 3D simulations of similar configurations exhibit a diversity of behaviours, including some where energy release is determined by the nonlinear relativistic drift-kink instability. Thus, 3D current-sheet evolution is not always fundamentally classical reconnection with perturbing 3D effects, but, rather, a complex interplay of multiple linear and nonlinear instabilities whose relative importance depends sensitively on the ambient plasma, minor configuration details, and even stochastic events. It often yields slower but longer-lasting and ultimately greater magnetic energy release than in 2D. Intriguingly, nonthermal particle acceleration is astonishingly robust, depending on the upstream magnetization and guide field, but otherwise yielding similar particle energy spectra in 2D and 3D. Though the variety of underlying current-sheet behaviours is interesting, the similarities in overall energy release and particle spectra may be more remarkable.

92 pages, 42 figures, 4 tables

References in corpus (23)

Cited by in corpus (19)