A collaborative path to scientific discovery: Distribution of labor, productivity and innovation in collaborative science

Abstract

In this work we dig into the process of scientific discovery by looking at a yet unexploited source of information: Polymath projects. Polymath projects are an original attempt to collectively solve mathematical problems in an online collaborative environment. To investigate the Polymath experiment, we analyze all the posts related to the projects that arrived to a peer reviewed publication with a particular attention to the organization of labor and the innovations originating from the author contributions. We observe that a significant presence of sporadic contributor boosts the productivity of the most active users and that productivity, in terms of number of posts, grows super-linearly with the number of contributors. When it comes to innovation in large scale collaborations, there is no exact rule determining, a priori, who the main innovators will be. Sometimes, serendipitous interactions by sporadic contributors can have a large impact on the discovery process and a single post by an occasional participant can steer the work into a new direction.

References in corpus (6)

• Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
• A tool for filtering information in complex systems
• Circadian patterns of Wikipedia editorial activity: A demographic analysis
• Empirical Tests of Zipf's law Mechanism In Open Source Linux Distribution
• Value production in a collaborative environment
• How Much is the Whole Really More than the Sum of its Parts? 1 + 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions