Identifying key differences between linear stochastic estimation and neural networks for fluid flow regressions
arXiv:2105.00913 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07515-7
Abstract
Neural networks (NNs) and linear stochastic estimation (LSE) have widely been utilized as powerful tools for fluid-flow regressions. We investigate fundamental differences between them considering two canonical fluid-flow problems: 1. the estimation of high-order proper orthogonal decomposition coefficients from low-order their counterparts for a flow around a two-dimensional cylinder, and 2. the state estimation from wall characteristics in a turbulent channel flow. In the first problem, we compare the performance of LSE to that of a multi-layer perceptron (MLP). With the channel flow example, we capitalize on a convolutional neural network (CNN) as a nonlinear model which can handle high-dimensional fluid flows. For both cases, the nonlinear NNs outperform the linear methods thanks to nonlinear activation functions. We also perform error-curve analyses regarding the estimation error and the response of weights inside models. Our analysis visualizes the robustness against noisy perturbation on the error-curve domain while revealing the fundamental difference of the covered tools for fluid-flow regressions.
11 pages, 9 figures
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Super-Resolution Analysis via Machine Learning: A Survey for Fluid Flows
- Multi-fidelity prediction of fluid flow and temperature field based on transfer learning using Fourier Neural Operator
- Assessments of epistemic uncertainty using Gaussian stochastic weight averaging for fluid-flow regression
- Three-dimensional generative adversarial networks for turbulent flow estimation from wall measurements
- Robust training approach of neural networks for fluid flow state estimations
- Reconstructing three-dimensional bluff body wake from sectional flow fields with convolutional neural networks
- Projection-based multifidelity linear regression for data-scarce applications