Deleting, Eliminating and Decomposing to Hereditary Classes Are All FPT-Equivalent
arXiv:2104.09950
Abstract
For a graph class , the graph parameters elimination distance to (denoted by ) [Bulian and Dawar, Algorithmica, 2016], and -treewidth (denoted by ) [Eiben et al. JCSS, 2021] aim to minimize the treedepth and treewidth, respectively, of the "torso" of the graph induced on a modulator to the graph class . Here, the torso of a vertex set in a graph is the graph with vertex set and an edge between two vertices if there is a path between and in whose internal vertices all lie outside . In this paper, we show that from the perspective of (non-uniform) fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), the three parameters described above give equally powerful parameterizations for every hereditary graph class that satisfies mild additional conditions. In fact, we show that for every hereditary graph class satisfying mild additional conditions, with the exception of parameterized by , for every pair of these parameters, computing one parameterized by itself or any of the others is FPT-equivalent to the standard vertex-deletion (to ) problem. As an example, we prove that an FPT algorithm for the vertex-deletion problem implies a non-uniform FPT algorithm for computing and . The conclusions of non-uniform FPT algorithms being somewhat unsatisfactory, we essentially prove that if is hereditary, union-closed, CMSO-definable, and (a) the canonical equivalence relation (or any refinement thereof) for membership in the class can be efficiently computed, or (b) the class admits a "strong irrelevant vertex rule", then there exists a uniform FPT algorithm for .
70 pages, To appear in SODA 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2103.09715, arXiv:2105.04660 by other authors