Neural tuning and representational geometry
arXiv:2104.09743
Abstract
A central goal of neuroscience is to understand the representations formed by brain activity patterns and their connection to behavior. The classical approach is to investigate how individual neurons encode the stimuli and how their tuning determines the fidelity of the neural representation. Tuning analyses often use the Fisher information to characterize the sensitivity of neural responses to small changes of the stimulus. In recent decades, measurements of large populations of neurons have motivated a complementary approach, which focuses on the information available to linear decoders. The decodable information is captured by the geometry of the representational patterns in the multivariate response space. Here we review neural tuning and representational geometry with the goal of clarifying the relationship between them. The tuning induces the geometry, but different sets of tuned neurons can induce the same geometry. The geometry determines the Fisher information, the mutual information, and the behavioral performance of an ideal observer in a range of psychophysical tasks. We argue that future studies can benefit from considering both tuning and geometry to understand neural codes and reveal the connections between stimulus, brain activity, and behavior.
42 pages, 6 figures
References in corpus (7)
- Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual system
- Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations
- Classification and Geometry of General Perceptual Manifolds
- The Sense of Place: Grid Cells in the Brain and the Transcendental Number e
- Multiplicative and additive modulation of neuronal tuning with population activity affects encoded information
- Maximally Informative Stimuli and Tuning Curves for Sigmoidal Rate-Coding Neurons and Populations
- Emergence of functional and structural properties of the head direction system by optimization of recurrent neural networks