Unsuitability of NOTEARS for Causal Graph Discovery
arXiv:2104.05441
Abstract
Causal Discovery methods aim to identify a DAG structure that represents causal relationships from observational data. In this article, we stress that it is important to test such methods for robustness in practical settings. As our main example, we analyze the NOTEARS method, for which we demonstrate a lack of scale-invariance. We show that NOTEARS is a method that aims to identify a parsimonious DAG from the data that explains the residual variance. We conclude that NOTEARS is not suitable for identifying truly causal relationships from the data.
arXiv comment6 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (8)
- DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning
- DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networks
- Causality for Machine Learning
- High-dimensional learning of linear causal networks via inverse covariance estimation
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs
- The Do-Calculus Revisited
- Differentiable Causal Discovery Under Unmeasured Confounding
- Data Generating Process to Evaluate Causal Discovery Techniques for Time Series Data