The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox
arXiv:2103.15177 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031054
Abstract
Generalizing prior work of P. W. Anderson and E. R. Huggins, we show that a "detailed Josephson-Anderson relation" holds for drag on a finite body held at rest in a classical incompressible fluid flowing with velocity The relation asserts an exact equality between the instantaneous power consumption by the drag, and the vorticity flux across the potential mass current, Here is the flux in the th coordinate direction of the conserved th component of vorticity and the line-integrals over are taken along streamlines of the potential flow solution of the ideal Euler equation, carrying mass flux The results generalize the theories of M. J. Lighthill for flow past a body and, in particular, the steady-state relation where is the generalized enthalpy or total pressure, extends Lighthill's theory of vorticity generation at solid walls into the interior of the flow. We use these results to explain drag on the body in terms of vortex dynamics, unifying the theories for classical fluids and for quantum superfluids. The results offer a new solution to the "D'Alembert paradox" at infinite Reynolds numbers and imply the necessary conditions for turbulent drag reduction.
18 pages, 5 figures. A few minor typos have been corrected
References in corpus (7)
- On the triggering of the Ultimate Regime of convection
- Onsager's Conjecture for the Incompressible Euler Equations in Bounded Domains
- Generation and Decay of Two-Dimensional Quantum Turbulence in a Trapped Bose-Einstein Condensate
- Turbulent Flow in Pipes and Channels as Cross-Stream "Inverse Cascades" of Vorticity
- Genesis of d'Alembert's paradox and analytical elaboration of the drag problem
- Vorticity Determines the Force on Bodies Immersed in Active Fluids
- Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager "ideal turbulence" theory