Which contributions count? Analysis of attribution in open source
arXiv:2103.11007 · doi:10.1109/MSR52588.2021.00036
Abstract
Open source software projects usually acknowledge contributions with text files, websites, and other idiosyncratic methods. These data sources are hard to mine, which is why contributorship is most frequently measured through changes to repositories, such as commits, pushes, or patches. Recently, some open source projects have taken to recording contributor actions with standardized systems; this opens up a unique opportunity to understand how community-generated notions of contributorship map onto codebases as the measure of contribution. Here, we characterize contributor acknowledgment models in open source by analyzing thousands of projects that use a model called All Contributors to acknowledge diverse contributions like outreach, finance, infrastructure, and community management. We analyze the life cycle of projects through this model's lens and contrast its representation of contributorship with the picture given by other methods of acknowledgment, including GitHub's top committers indicator and contributions derived from actions taken on the platform. We find that community-generated systems of contribution acknowledgment make work like idea generation or bug finding more visible, which generates a more extensive picture of collaboration. Further, we find that models requiring explicit attribution lead to more clearly defined boundaries around what is and what is not a contribution.
arXiv commentExtended version of a paper accepted at MSR 2021
References in corpus (4)
- Detecting and Characterizing Bots that Commit Code
- Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook from Inria
- A Dataset and an Approach for Identity Resolution of 38 Million Author IDs extracted from 2B Git Commits
- More than Code: Contributions in Scrum Software Engineering Teams